By Adam Pagnucco.

A coalition of 40 organizations who support rent control have written to the county council demanding a strong bill.  The groups are focused on a set of amendments that will be considered tomorrow when the council is scheduled to vote on rent control legislation.  Everyone expects some form of rent control to pass so these amendments matter a lot.  The supporters’ letter is reprinted below.

*****

July 17, 2023

Montgomery County Council

100 Maryland Avenue

Rockville MD 20850

Dear Council President Glass, Council Vice President Friedson, and members of the County Council,

Thank you for your leadership in pushing a comprehensive rent stabilization bill that will be discussed by the full Council on Tuesday, July 18th, 2023. Rent stabilization is essential to ensure that tenants, many of who have lived here for years, can continue calling Montgomery County their homes. Families and children cannot thrive if they are concerned about being pushed out. We look forward to celebrating a final bill package with you that provides fair, clear, and comprehensive protection for renters in our county.

We urge the County Council to pass rent stabilization as recommended by the PHP Committee with the following additional amendments:

We strongly SUPPORT the following amendments. Without these additions, families who need and deserve basic protections will fall through the cracks through extensive evictions or rising fees.

  • Add an amendment for vacancy control, which is essential to ensure that predatory landlords are not evicting tenants in order to raise the rent higher than the cap. Since we don’t have Just Cause Eviction, we need to make sure our county protects our residents. This policy is used in different areas around the country, including Takoma Park, Maryland. Without vacancy control, landlords will be able to reset their rate above the cap every single year by simply evicting tenants.
  • Add an amendment to regulate fees. We have heard from Prince George’s County, Maryland, that landlords are increasing fees drastically, much higher than the rent cap. This amendment is important to close the loophole that we have seen in other jurisdictions.

We are CONCERNED about:

  • Any banking amendment that is not accompanied by vacancy control. Under both the Glass and Stewart amendments, a landlord would be allowed to bank unused increases from the past for renewing tenants but not for new tenants. Without vacancy control, landlords would be limitless in charging whatever they want to new tenants. This sets up a substantial incentive for landlords to evict tenants. In addition, Councilmember Glass’s amendment has no limits on how long a landlord could bank unused increases setting up a scenario with allowable increases at double or treble the cap. Banking should ONLY pass if we pass vacancy control.

We strongly OPPOSE the following amendments:

  • Oppose increasing the rent cap. We ask the Council to follow the recommendations from the PHP Committee. Tenants and advocates prefer the cap to be lower and cannot allow for the cap to go higher. This would impact tenants tremendously.
  • Oppose the substantial renovation rehab exemption introduced by Councilmember Luedke. This exemption would allow landlords to get exemptions without sufficient investment in renovation. Councilmember Stewart’s amendment is a more reasonable alternative especially by prohibiting buildings that continue to have code violations from accessing the exemption.
  • Oppose the amendment exempting many landlords based on size. This amendment would exempt landlords smaller than four units from rent stabilization, and was rejected at the last PHP committee worksession.
  • Oppose the month-to-month exemption. This would impact many residents, including teachers, who often go month-to-month between school years as they wait to find out if/where they’ll be transferred, and people in eviction proceedings, who are already some of the most vulnerable residents in the county.
  • Oppose the amendment exempting all buildings constructed after 2000. This exempts almost 25% of current rental properties plus any new development. It also reduces the stock of affordable and regulated housing over time.
  • Oppose any sunset date, which would turn the push for permanent rent stabilization into another temporary rent stabilization bill. No sunset date is acceptable since it creates uncertainty for tenants and landlords.

Montgomery County has an opportunity to pass a strong bill that protects renters and includes incentives for landlords, such as Fair Return Petitions and exemptions for new buildings. We ask the Council to include vacancy control and add an amendment to regulate fees. We also ask that you oppose amendments that weaken the bill, especially the sunset date, increasing the rent cap, month to month exemptions, and other amendments that would undermine the protections intended by the bill.

Thank you for your supporting Montgomery County Residents. We urge you to VOTE in favor of Bill 15-23 as recommended by the PHP Committee, with vacancy control, effective date change, and regulated fees. We urge you not to include amendments that would be harmful to Montgomery County Residents.

Sincerely,

1199 SEIU United Healthcare Workers East

Action in Montgomery (AIM)

ACQ (Ask the Climate Question)

African Communities Together

Anakbayan MoCo

Bethesda African Cemetery Coalition

Biodiversity for a Livable Climate

CASA

Charter House Tenants Association

Chesapeake Climate Action Network

Colespring Plaza Tenants Association

Everyday Canvassing

Francophone Africans Alliance

Impact Silver Spring

Jews United for Justice

LiUNA Local 11

Maryland Poor People’s Campaign

Maven Tenants Union

MoCo Pride Center

Montgomery County BIPOC Green New Deal Internship

Montgomery County Branch of the NAACP

Montgomery County Green New Deal for Social Housing

Montgomery County Democratic Socialists of America

Montgomery County Education Association

Montgomery County Racial Equity (MORE) Network

Our Revolution Montgomery County

Progressive Maryland

Progressive Neighbors

Renters United Maryland

SEIU Local 500

Shepherd’s Table

The Renters Alliance

Transit Alternatives to Midcounty Highway Extended (TAME) Coalition

Trans Maryland

UFCW 1994, MCGEO

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 400

UNITE HERE! Local 23

UNITE HERE! Local 25

Unitarian Universalist Cedar Lane Environmental Justice Ministry

Young People for Progress

Tagged in: